Oh, No, Not Again

We have enough codes dangling in dungeons or microscopic specks of injustice for those who aren't in denial about them to speak out. We talk about it among ourselves, but there's no Martin Luther King Jr. to uncover wrongs and lead the fight against injustice.People are dying out there while our jails are over-populated with a rising rate of recidivism promoted by unfair barometers, but these laws remain. (No space to spell out the problem except to say prison's in dire need of reform since they're filled with people who had minor drug infractions, and taxpayers are paying more to lock 'em up than it costs to educate one prisoner)

Voters' Rights Under Siege

"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere."
 -- Martin Luther King Jr.



I don't care what anybody says, those broad swipes at radically changing the voting rights by forcing people to provide state identification is a chilling effect on our basic rights. Supporters of this movement claim they're doing it because of potential voter fraud. Oh, they could never keep apathetic voters and others who already distrust the system from voting.

On this issue I'm sickened by the watchdogs -- gatekeepers -- who're seemingly sleeping on the job. They are the ones who keep eyes on government and hold the powerful accountable. We have all of this media, the Internet, and God knows there are enough bloggers and other gatekeepers to chime loudly about this injustice. Oh, if it's just to avert voter fraud, why now? We've never worried about that before and where's the crisis. For once public officials are proactive and not reactive about the urgent crisis. Really?

Voter identification is being rightly challenged, but that probably won't be resolved by election 2012. There's pollution floating, but, oh, where's the Tea Party, Occupied America and Republicans/Democrats who supposedly support freedom? Silence. Oh, that's exactly what I thought. They're not worried because they understand the clandestine agenda in these well-defined, oops, laws to take back the people's White House from those whose ancestors built it and from a president who won in a legitimate, fair election.

I feel dirty from all that floating pollution that assault my sensibilities when I hear these disruptions to overcome our national issues. Why aren't all of these people who claim to love their country rallying around the issue of freedom lost? Why don't we all work together rather than bicker and handicap voters? Of course, looks like it's their right to thwart  efforts to destroy voting rights by any means necessary  If you can't change the law, get around it.

Oh, how dare I suggest that supporters should be worried about basic rights or freedom for those left behind the privileged. Does anybody not understand this chilling effect of basic rights? If nobody rights this wrong, it doesn't mean it's right to move toward infringement of these rights, hiding behind presumed voter fraud when there's no wide chasms of illegality at work.

If this so-called election fraud movement stands without valid proof of its need, what next? Will we start asking people to touch their toes, write an essay about why they love America, write their name in beautiful cursive on unlined paper, name all of the presidents, or even recite the capital of all the states? We used to have rules that barred voting for fictitious reasons to bar black citizens from voting. What if we're trying to turn back the hands of time?

I've listened and watched this insidious plot without sufficient proof of necessity -- again -- rampant voter fraud? I've said this before, but it bears repeating because we have no rampant rage of pillaging of our most precious right. We have people sitting at home thinking they are once again being shuffled to the back of the bus. If that's the point, our levees are cracked and water is rushing toward break-down level.

Every time we chip away at a right, we lose more freedoms. Hint: The War on Drugs and The War on Terrorism (the airport fiasco, no-knock warrants, public body cavity searches with Milwaukee police officers under investigation, search and seizure without warrants, the no-knock police department laws. None of these laws have made us more secure, but rights have been lost every time a police officer ransack the home of innocent people or put under suspicious by driving while black or Latino profiling. Do-good citizens are targeted while the prison population for people of color has escalated to historic and disproportionate beyond white populations.

(Don't believe me? Call or check The Sentencing Project on the Internet)

If we value our freedom, it's important to fight for every slice of  equality under siege. If not, America won't be America as we know it -- the country where immigrants arrive, expecting the American Dream and the promise of full-fledged freedom.

Where's all this fraud in voting rights? We didn't rush to change the voting methods when President Bush's election cried loudly, clearly about voting problems -- no crisis though -- but eleven years later we're manufacturing an outrageous lie. Supporters know why, and so do I, know the urgency of this covert mission, but it won't  happen again. People aren't that dumb, and I hope their voices are loud publicly not just softly among themselves.

Let Me Tell You...: A Smart Joke Or Insensitivity

Let Me Tell You...: A Smart Joke Or Insensitivity: President Obama wants everybody to go to college. What a snob? -- Rick Santorum President Obama wants everybody to go to college. He wants...

A Smart Joke Or Insensitivity

President Obama wants everybody to go to college. What a snob? -- Rick Santorum

President Obama wants everybody to go to college. He wants everybody to be like him. -- Rick Santorum

First, I'd like to address the "snob" comment. Anyone who thinks the president is a snob needs to know this: That isn't a snob-type of comment. And here's why:

A snob doesn't care if anybody else gets educated. A snob's too arrogant and possibly narcisstic to care about anyone else's American Dream. A snob looks down on people because they aren't status quo of the rich and/or famous. A nobody has no right to education -- snob thinking.

In fact, to feel good about one's self, some people need to feel superior to others. It's a good thing that everybody is equal in God's eyes.

Here's what I know for fact. The president knows that to partake in the American Dream college or technical training allows everyone a viable chance.Those who don't think everyone needs an education, remember that those tax deductions rise with income unless you're millionaires who get large tax cuts.

A snobbish attitude is one's own business -- though wrongheaded -- unless they're president or vying to become one because that would tell people you're for the status quo. There's no need for higher education for all, and that shouldn't change, they'd think.

Yep! The snob's got his. Why worry about others less worthy? they'd think.

Everybody doesn't want to attend college. Many never want to complete high school. Santorum should check the high school dropout rates of all groups, and he'd know everybody couldn't go to college. Period.

I'm so sorry that higher education isn't a barometer for success in everyone's mind. Unless we get tens and thousands of manufacturing jobs back, the uneducated are not likely to get those good jobs that brought middle class status to their parents' generation.That's why I'm not laughing. Tough times and illiteracy are no joke.

Birth Control? Who's Business Is It?

Anyone who is pro-lfe or anti-abortion, like Rick Santorum -- GOP's candidate vying for presidential ticket -- and other men leaders -- stand tall in a hypocritical posture. Mentioning or trampling birth control necessity for women is another political ploy to control women's bodies.

But they said the government shouldn't be involved with this and that. Why would they want to deny birth control or even discuss it, for that matter, if they're against abortion. Are they telling us that women must not have sex? One way or another, women need protection from unplanned pregnancy because if they have sex there's a good chance pregnancy (Oops) is likely to happen.

Where would these oversexed men get their ...? Let's see, married women ought not to use birth control or abortion to control their own bodies in case their libido runs wide. Single women ought to save it for marriage. Is that the message in the misguided political pill? Return to Good 'ol Boy Days? And guess what?

These women out there competing with men for political positions or high ceiling jobs would be "tied down" with babies. Men used to, and some still do, want to keep their women "barefoot and pregnant."

Is that what these bragadocio(s) are saying? Oh, maybe they haven't got that far in their "Bring back yesterday" rhetoric, but the protect women's body code is hidden in the sound bites.

Regardless, if we don't have birth control, there's a good chance pregnant women who want an abortion will opt for one -- more or less. Now opponents against women's rights, you cannot eat your doughnut and keep it unthawed in the fridge.

Besides, it's a woman's business about taking birth control, too, and she doesn't need politicians using the issue to plump up their political position by addressing that privacy. Aren't there enough political needs to discuss and fix?

Politicians -- state or federal -- should wrap their lips with duck tape on this personal matter?

Morality? What About Child Sex Abuse?

Those birth control pills were originally a political ploy until Obama reversed the decision to avoid a morality issue for Catholic leaders who would've had to pay for contraceptives for women employees. I was elated that this issue was solved without GOP ticket contender Rick Santorum continuing to blast off his misguided (Shall I say lie?) message about the president trampling on religious freedom. "This is not about contraceptives," he bellowed into living rooms across America.

Where was Santorum when the moralistic Catholics and the Evangelicals or Moral Majority pasted their lips with Elmer's Glue in the aftermath of child sex scandals across this country -- churches, schools, homes, and even Hollywood -- who've taken advantage of children -- in the worst way. Isn't that a lack of morality? It certainly is loss of  freedom and dignity morality, and a destruction of boys turning to men or girls turning to women. Many turn to alcohol and drugs to assuage their guilt. Don't believe me? Ask Dr. Drew and other alcohol and drug experts. Besides I have personal knowledge about that, too.

It's aggregious that boys and girls are sexually abused in this land of freedom, but we churn and chew over freedom and morality about church's rights. Isn't this taking advantage of our most vulnerable? Where's freedom when neither girls or boys are protected? I want to see the outcry for freedom take a minute to mention children's freedom not just birth control or the unborn.

And, worse, morality over birth control is hardly one that we should be screaming about. Why the silence about child sexual abuse across the country? Oh, yeah. I forgot about the public clamoring and political pundits sounding off until stories burn to ashes or gets archived in the computer. Or until the next story breaks. Then: Nothing's done. It suggests that we care more about unborn babies than live children who suffer at the hands of grown, rusty pedophiles. What a shame? America needs to focus on how to clean up sordid acts of violence against children.

States provide medical care for poor? Preposterous

Ironically, Michelle Bachman and her GOP gang who have sufficient medical care want to appeal what they call "Obama Care." Technically, it isn't Obama Care; Congress passed this bill that Sen. Ted Kennedy fought for throughout his political life. The states? Come on, politicians and people who think the 45 million uninsured have no right to medical care even though Congress and their loved ones have Cadillac Care at taxpayer expense. (Congress, how about paying premiums for your own health care? How about donating 10% of your salary toward so-called lucrative "Obama Care". That would be a start for you who claim you care about taxpayers' quality of life. While we're at it: How about reducing your salary by 10% to help balance the budget? And how about working half-time since you don't do enough for a full-time job and full-time taxpayer money)

It's God-awful that you choose to put politics before people who pay your salaries. And by the way, in case you forgot, it isn't just your district that pays your salary. The money comes out of the same iron pot. Oh, by the way, did it ever occur to you that medical cost is higher when people don't get preventive care or early-stage treatment. Oh, I cannot forgot the eerie words of  young and old who say: "They just want us to roll over and die. They don't care if we die." I try hard not to believe this, but I'm cynical by trade: You're widow- and widower-makers not to mention the young children losing their own lives and many left without parents. Many of you have no creative thinking skills and, of course, no shame either, but it's all about the money, isn't it? Well, that's why you should take at least one or two of my suggestion.

Oh, yeah, let's pass the torch to the callous states, which have had nearly a half century to provide health care the GOP debaters keep spewing about. Some states, like Wisconsin, are in the process of abandoning the Medicaid program that has allowed uninsured, necessary coverage. North Carolina lets people die from high blood pressure when that medication is widespread and dirt cheap.

 My brother fell dead because of hypertensive cardiac disease, which derives from long-term, untreated high blood pressure. He lost his health, his home, and his wife when he couldn't get a full-time job despite his brick layer skills. He was a homeless and indigent man who worked as a day laborer, and subcontractors refused to pay him on Friday as they promised. He was helpless and hopeless with a family of origin unable to take care of themselves. My sister, a caregiver for my mother, and minimal worker without health insurance on the job, fell ill because of a heart disease and continuous high blood pressure. Her fifty dollar co-pay prevents her from keeping critical meds on hand. Her doctor and many others require patients to return to their office to get refills. (It's all about the money, um huh) No matter how serious your blood pressure is, you get no meds even if the pharmacist requests it. My Walgreen's gets approval without hesitancy.

Most of my family and tens of thousand others are suffering and dying because they lack basic and/or critical care. State governments have had five decades to do what Republicans call state rights. Baloney. But the Bachman clan vows to  appeal "Obama Care" and let the state cover the uninsured. (Oh, by the way, every uninsured person isn't uneducated and poor. Many of these people lost their jobs or lost their coverage because employers dropped coverage or simply never could "afford" to provide it for their low-rent employees. In order to get around providing benefits with health insurance, in some cases, employers exempt part-time workers from the benefit. Others force employees to work 37 hours or less to avoid providing benefits.

Now the Supreme Court is going to decide what a lower court says was legal. I have no queries of why this country is off track: Rich gets richer. Poor gets poorer. Middle class is sliding in the mud. My dad always said, "Republican is the party of the rich." My great-grandmother, my father-in-law -- all who lived to be ripe aged wisdom -- said the same.